Jap wideblock vs narrowblock

This section is for talk about anything to do with transmission or drivetrain.
Post Reply
User avatar
Rally_2.6LC
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:59 am
Location: Either under a car, on the computer or in bed...around Ryde

Jap wideblock vs narrowblock

Post by Rally_2.6LC »

Is the Jap 5sp wideblock gearbox any stronger than the Jap 5sp narrowblock gearbox?
I know starion ones are but i want to know about the normal jap 5 speeds as I have both, and multiple possible engine configurations but need more compressiona and more power so want to decide what engine i should start collecting bits for.


Cheers Matt
'75 GC daily (slowly dying)
'80 LC 2.6L rally car (generally something broken until 2 weeks before an event)
'71 GA 2.6 Turbo project (i only wanted the diff and got another project)
^This side up^


Formely "Matt"
Superscan811
Posts: 1689
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:12 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Jap wideblock vs narrowblock

Post by Superscan811 »

Matt,
the output shaft is thicker on a wideblock jap 5speed gearbox and some of the bearings are a bit stronger as well.
The starion/pajero/triton wideblock gearboxes are different again. Different ratio's/gear width/bearings etc.
If you are going N/A, use the narrow, if you are going turbo, go wide.

Narrow for N/A because there will be less mass in the flywheel/clutch setup.
Wide for turbo because more mass is good and if you need to get a stronger gearbox, the starion gearbox will bolt straight on.

Cheers.
User avatar
Rally_2.6LC
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:59 am
Location: Either under a car, on the computer or in bed...around Ryde

Re: Jap wideblock vs narrowblock

Post by Rally_2.6LC »

So I should use a Magna bottom end for my rally car then.
Whats advantage/disadvantage of Magna vs Sigma? I know the sigma had a better quality crank or something, what about rods?


Cheers Matt
'75 GC daily (slowly dying)
'80 LC 2.6L rally car (generally something broken until 2 weeks before an event)
'71 GA 2.6 Turbo project (i only wanted the diff and got another project)
^This side up^


Formely "Matt"
User avatar
cheaterparts
Posts: 660
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:06 pm
Location: Cranbourne Vic

Re: Jap wideblock vs narrowblock

Post by cheaterparts »

Superscan811 wrote:Matt,
the output shaft is thicker on a wideblock jap 5speed gearbox and some of the bearings are a bit stronger as well.
The starion/pajero/triton wideblock gearboxes are different again. Different ratio's/gear width/bearings etc.
If you are going N/A, use the narrow, if you are going turbo, go wide.

Narrow for N/A because there will be less mass in the flywheel/clutch setup.
Wide for turbo because more mass is good and if you need to get a stronger gearbox, the starion gearbox will bolt straight on.

Cheers.
the wide and narrow boxes use the same gears / syncro rings and bearing except 1 the spiget bearing between the input and output shafts
the narrow box has smaller splines on both input and output shafts but are the same size from the front bearing to the speedo drive
the starion box uses the same ratios but some of the gears are wider they still use the same synros and the layshaft is on taper roller bearings
pajero/triton use a wider ratio gear set

I have fitted the large spine shafts to my narrow box the main reasons were its easier to fit 23 spline to a tilton race clutch than the smaller shaft
and to change to extention housing to the larger bush type of the wide box it has a couple of lumps that can be drilled and tapped to fit a plate over the plug behind the gear shift shaft
I've had them come out while racing - you dont loose much oil when this happens but just enough to make the exhuast smoke
and then the black flags come out and theres no fun in that
cheater
User avatar
cheaterparts
Posts: 660
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:06 pm
Location: Cranbourne Vic

Re: Jap wideblock vs narrowblock

Post by cheaterparts »

Rally_2.6LC wrote:So I should use a Magna bottom end for my rally car then.
Whats advantage/disadvantage of Magna vs Sigma? I know the sigma had a better quality crank or something, what about rods?
Cheers Matt
the crank and rods are much the same and interchangable and i dont beleve there is any difference in quality in ether
cheater
camB
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:37 am
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Jap wideblock vs narrowblock

Post by camB »

Must just say... always look for your posts Cheater: Direct. Authoritative. Clear and easily understood.

Thank you.
User avatar
Rally_2.6LC
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:59 am
Location: Either under a car, on the computer or in bed...around Ryde

Re: Jap wideblock vs narrowblock

Post by Rally_2.6LC »

Ill second that CamB

Unfortunalty Cheater i dont have much money so ill be building a motor (as current one dead) with new struts and brakes and then looking into gearboxes a little later.
Got a diff on the way (stored at Scott's) and then hydraulic handbrake.


Cheers Matt
'75 GC daily (slowly dying)
'80 LC 2.6L rally car (generally something broken until 2 weeks before an event)
'71 GA 2.6 Turbo project (i only wanted the diff and got another project)
^This side up^


Formely "Matt"
billhincher
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 12:40 am
Location: Toledo,Ohio
Contact:

Re: Jap wideblock vs narrowblock

Post by billhincher »

the major improvement in engine block design is the hieght of the deck on the 4G64, its about 10mm higher then the narrow block, with that length, you can use longer rods and increase the 'rod ratio' adding a lot of power
the wider bolt pattern for the transmission improves strength because a wider pattern requires less effort at that union
this is the second gen casting of the wide block R154, it fits much better and the thickness is adjusted in all the right places

Image
the flow of the casting is much nicer, this has a much nicer finish look to it

Image
Image
I dig the diagonal lines in the housing, that adds wall thickness to the radius of the curve in the housing and torsional strength for the twisting motion
Image
the demensions worked out the have the right wall thickness in the right areas to build strength without much wieght penalty
Image
the throw out bearing was moved back 1/2 inch to get a better pivot point on the folcrum of the clutch fork
Image
Image
the depth was absolutly correct and it is a direct ft to the G54 engine using all the same clutch parts that came standard on the carquest with the exception of a $45.00 disc from a Supra 7me engine
Image
Image
I have the throw out bodies built at the casting shop now , they are lighter and much easier to build
Image

Image
Last edited by billhincher on Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:03 am, edited 2 times in total.
Image
webby
Posts: 1644
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:38 am
Location: Parkes, NSW

Re: Jap wideblock vs narrowblock

Post by webby »

Magna's didn't have 4G64's until about '95, it'll be the late model 4G54 that Matt's on about
-Josh.
Image
Daily: 7/96 EF Falcon, 4.0 SOHC, BTR95LE, 3.45:1 LSD/Lukey extractors, full 2.5” exhaust, EL intake, Tickford snorkel, 87DA cam, AU injectors, shiftkits.com.au single stage kit. PB 14.93@91mph.
Project: Red '81 Scorpion-http://www.sigma-galant.com/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=11889
User avatar
Rally_2.6LC
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:59 am
Location: Either under a car, on the computer or in bed...around Ryde

Re: Jap wideblock vs narrowblock

Post by Rally_2.6LC »

Yea Webby's right.......was on about 4G54 as thats what most of us refer to 'wideblock' or 'narrowblock' over here.
However interesting info that you put forward. Thanks.


Cheers Matt
'75 GC daily (slowly dying)
'80 LC 2.6L rally car (generally something broken until 2 weeks before an event)
'71 GA 2.6 Turbo project (i only wanted the diff and got another project)
^This side up^


Formely "Matt"
Post Reply