Should i use hydraulic cam setup or go back to solid?

This section is for talk about anything to do with everything in the engine bay.
Post Reply
User avatar
WagonWheel
Posts: 195
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 4:53 pm

Should i use hydraulic cam setup or go back to solid?

Post by WagonWheel »

Need to know what will be better off for my setup.
Building a 2.0ltr efi turbo astron. Picked up an M7 head today, obviously hydraulic setup. I will be putting in a turbo friendly cam, now should i leave it as is or put the old astron 1 stuff in and go solid?
Ive seen people do both, i would like to know ups and downs of both setups if possible.
Cheers
Geoff
User avatar
rob020
Posts: 832
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: Tas

Re: Should i use hydraulic cam setup or go back to solid?

Post by rob020 »

ive got a 2l cam and adjustable rockers in my magna head...

dont really know of the ups or down of the conversion, but i heard the hydraulic tappets can start to float above a certain rpm..
and theres something relaxing about checking valve clearances lol

cheers,
rob
"launching missiles? who do they think i am? iraq? where would i get a missile from?" "that means rocks too dumbaass" "oh"
conversation recently overheard at police station after big night out
22dodge
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:26 am

Re: Should i use hydraulic cam setup or go back to solid?

Post by 22dodge »

if you are using the car for performance, definitely go with solid adjusters. I tried hydraulics on my race car and had valve float at 6200. with solid adjusters on the same engine I was able to go past 7500 rpm. I also noticed a lot more power mid range with mechanical adjusters
BAD-SIG
Posts: 520
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:05 am
Location: Ballarat, VIC
Contact:

Re: Should i use hydraulic cam setup or go back to solid?

Post by BAD-SIG »

I just tried to fit the adjustable tappets/rockers to my Astron II head and while it all bolts up and fits, there's way too much play on the rockers when the valves are closed! I used the early model cam, rockers, rocker arms with the later model front and rear rocker arm mounts...
Please click below to visit my blog dedicated to my GE Sigma SE:
http://www.galant-sigma.com

Please click below to visit my cardomain website dedicated to my GE Sigma SE:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/293989

Image
User avatar
Sigmaproject
Posts: 1143
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:11 am
Location: Maitland NSW

Re: Should i use hydraulic cam setup or go back to solid?

Post by Sigmaproject »

I ran the early model adjustable rockers and cam for 10 years on my GN. Never had an issue. Only just recently removed it to put on rollers.
I just had a look at the adjustable rocker setup I took off ,and there is still a mile of adjustment left whey they have the specified clearance.
BAD-SIG
Posts: 520
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:05 am
Location: Ballarat, VIC
Contact:

Re: Should i use hydraulic cam setup or go back to solid?

Post by BAD-SIG »

Strange, I was able to get the right adjustment but the inner bolt was half way inside the locknut's thread! Also, how did you seal up the back of the head with the roller rocker cam? I tried a stock TR Magna rear cam seal but it moves and leaks because there's no water pump pulley to keep it in place...
Please click below to visit my blog dedicated to my GE Sigma SE:
http://www.galant-sigma.com

Please click below to visit my cardomain website dedicated to my GE Sigma SE:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/293989

Image
mic_77
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:43 pm

Re: Should i use hydraulic cam setup or go back to solid?

Post by mic_77 »

Sounds like you need longer adjuster screws the last set I used was out of a early 80's laser or you can change to Porsche 911 elephant feet adjuster screws they are a lot nicer to the tops of your valves.

Cheers Mic
Post Reply