Compression ratios

This section is for 1976 to 1987 Chrysler/Mitsubishi/Colt Galant/Sigma/Lonsdale.
Post Reply
sceneybr
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 6:52 pm
Location: Drouin, Victoria

Compression ratios

Post by sceneybr »

Hi just wondering if someone can tell me the stock compression ratios for a gj 1984 sigma 2.6 and the earliest magna running the flat tops in the 2.6 just wondering cause putting stock flat tops in my sigma? need some answers soon please.
webby
Posts: 1644
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:38 am
Location: Parkes, NSW

Re: Compression ratios

Post by webby »

Around 8.3:1, and I'm pretty sure flat tops started in the GN siggy
-Josh.
Image
Daily: 7/96 EF Falcon, 4.0 SOHC, BTR95LE, 3.45:1 LSD/Lukey extractors, full 2.5” exhaust, EL intake, Tickford snorkel, 87DA cam, AU injectors, shiftkits.com.au single stage kit. PB 14.93@91mph.
Project: Red '81 Scorpion-http://www.sigma-galant.com/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=11889
84GSR
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:32 am

Re: Compression ratios

Post by 84GSR »

Its 8.2:1 for the Astron 1 and 8.8:1 for the Astron 2. TR Magna Astron engine was 9.2:1. The Astron2 detbued in the GK around May 1985. Had a couple of GK wagons with astron 2s. Don't try putting the flat tops from the later engines into the early ones as the pistons will hit the cylinder head.
sceneybr
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 6:52 pm
Location: Drouin, Victoria

Re: Compression ratios

Post by sceneybr »

JUST WONDERING ABOUT THAT LAST POST I HAVE AN ASTRON 1 ENGINE 2.6 I HEARD THAT STOCK MAGNA FLAT TOPS WOULD FIT AND GIVE BETTER COMPRESSION CAN ANY ONE GIVE ME DEFINITE ANSWER OR HAS SOMEONE DONE IT.
GB_BB4C
Posts: 932
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:37 am
Location: Adelaide, SA

Re: Compression ratios

Post by GB_BB4C »

sceneybr wrote:JUST WONDERING ABOUT THAT LAST POST I HAVE AN ASTRON 1 ENGINE 2.6 I HEARD THAT STOCK MAGNA FLAT TOPS WOULD FIT AND GIVE BETTER COMPRESSION CAN ANY ONE GIVE ME DEFINITE ANSWER OR HAS SOMEONE DONE IT.
Flat tops will fit in the Aston 1 block but unless you sink the valves into the head or have the pistons skimmed a bit they will hit one another.
Your compression will be up around 11:1
2* 73 A53 16L Dodge Colt (Plymouth Cricket), 2* 73 GB Galant Sedan's, 1* 74 GB Galant Sedan, 1* 76 VK Valiant Regal,
1* 79 GE SE Sigma Sedan, 1* 81 GH Sigma PWS, 1* 84 GK Sigma SE, 1* 85 GK Sigma GL - Replacing the 84 GK SE, 1* 91 GTO - FOR SALE

Image
C_Fernance
Posts: 728
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:19 am
Location: Central Coast

Re: Compression ratios

Post by C_Fernance »

84GSR wrote:Don't try putting the flat tops from the later engines into the early ones as the pistons will hit the cylinder head.
They don't always hit. I once done a dodgy rebuild in the front yard in a day after destroying an engine (dropped a valve which put a hole through a piston and destroyed the head) and needing the car for work the following day.

Engine started out as an Astron II in a GK Scorp. Block and crank were OK so were reused. Pistons and rods were flat tops out of a TM or TN Magna - with the original Scorp bearings reused and new rings. Head was an Astron I off a GH Scorpion. Put it all back together and got it running that afternoon. Only new parts were a couple of gaskets and the rings.

Apart from the high compression meaning I had to run 98octane and even then had trouble with pinging the engine ran fine and was used like that for another year or 2.
84GSR
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:32 am

Re: Compression ratios

Post by 84GSR »

having said what I did,I have heard of people getting away with it. The engine in my car runs magna pistons and did have an astron on head. Valves were heavily recessed. However,the pitons in mine don't reach the top of the bore so I suspect some skullduggery with the crank. Most magna pistons usually come up level with the deck if not proud of it. Best rule of thumb is don't do it. I have seen one engine where the pistons had to be machined to clear the valves and the head. Then theirs the fuel issue because of compression ratios.
Basically,it looks like experience with this varies considerably. The safe way is not to do it. But you can getaway with it,as has bee mentioned. Sounds like there are more variations with the engines than I new of. Especially when you involve the imported engines. There are a couple of guys on this forum that have a lot of experience with NA high performance mods on these motors. I'tll be interesting to see what they say when they find the thread.
Superscan811
Posts: 1689
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:12 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Compression ratios

Post by Superscan811 »

There are HIGH and LOW compression flat top pistons for the astron engines.
The high comp have a 1mm higher compression height (36mm) than the low comp ones (35mm).
The TS magna piston (with the kidney shaped recess) has a compression height of 36.5mm

Cheers.
User avatar
Rally_2.6LC
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:59 am
Location: Either under a car, on the computer or in bed...around Ryde

Re: Compression ratios

Post by Rally_2.6LC »

I had Astron II magna block, forged flat top pistons and a Jap spec 2L head in my beast before the bottom end let go.......ran somewhere aroun 12.5-13:1 I was told by someone who did the math. It felt like it too.
I raced it around Wakefield Park (got 12 flying laps on second hand crappy race tyres before it shat itself) but it wasnt running properly, had to shift early as wasnt reving out. This year with my new efi engine (scorp block, scorp pistons, M3 head, TR injection) and propper semi slick tyres i was only getting 3 seconds a lap faster :(
The current efi setup only runs around 8:1. More compression = more speed.


Cheers Matt
'75 GC daily (slowly dying)
'80 LC 2.6L rally car (generally something broken until 2 weeks before an event)
'71 GA 2.6 Turbo project (i only wanted the diff and got another project)
^This side up^


Formely "Matt"
Post Reply